# NSA, 인터넷 장악까지 단 며칠 남아

> Clean Markdown view of GeekNews topic #14375. Use the original source for factual precision when an external source URL is present.

## Metadata

- GeekNews HTML: [https://news.hada.io/topic?id=14375](https://news.hada.io/topic?id=14375)
- GeekNews Markdown: [https://news.hada.io/topic/14375.md](https://news.hada.io/topic/14375.md)
- Type: GN+
- Author: [neo](https://news.hada.io/@neo)
- Published: 2024-04-18T09:48:19+09:00
- Updated: 2024-04-18T09:48:19+09:00
- Original source: [twitter.com/Snowden](https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1779920066840055847)
- Points: 1
- Comments: 1

## Topic Body

_No topic body._

## Comments



### Comment 24505

- Author: neo
- Created: 2024-04-18T09:48:19+09:00
- Points: 1

###### [Hacker News 의견](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40062271) 
Here is a summary of the key points and perspectives from the Hacker News comments:

- The proposed amendment to the FISA bill could force any company or individual providing communication services to assist in NSA surveillance. This is seen as a concerning expansion of government surveillance powers.

- Some argue this capability already effectively exists, as companies can only refuse government requests in limited cases. Major tech companies try to architect systems to limit access to user data.

- There is speculation the NSA may already have broad surveillance capabilities through classified programs and zero-day exploits. Laws like this could provide legal cover to use intelligence gathered covertly.

- The amendment is compared to China's model of compelling citizens to assist the state. Given the US's key role in internet infrastructure, this has global implications.

- Decentralized, peer-to-peer encrypted platforms are proposed as a technical solution, but face challenges from advertising, paid hosting models, and regulation. 

- Questions are raised about the legality and ethics of forcing nearly everyone to potentially be a "spy" for the government.

- Context is lacking for those not following the legislative details closely. The linked articles provide more background on the specific amendment and the political dynamics around FISA reauthorization.